As AI tools begin to automate academic illustrations, how can researchers maintain a balance between creative expression and automation? Have you used PaperBanana or similar tools to enhance your work, and how do you ensure that your personal style is still reflected in the illustrations? Please share examples and insights about combining creativity with AI technology.
This is an excellent question. Did you attend the presentation hosted by the Industry's finest? I'm still trying to pull of the facade of belonging in this level of "the league" with a lot of pretending I know what IDE and Agency really even mean in this "matrix."
Bluntly put... I have believe unless you can replicate the illustration via the old traditional paper'n'pencil method, any notions of style critiquing and the sort, should be parried with this tort, "In order for something to be infered it needs to be implied first. So it blows my mind this where just going to go with the inference ouput by the 'agent."
So, in conclusion, I caught about 100% of what Dawei Zhu presented in PaperBanana crashcourse. I understand about 2% more quantum mechanics than before. Seriously... TL/DR - I don't trust inference machines but I do trust humans and top blokes like Nate... who wreckons I'm the number "one fan" in this "community."
It cracks me up what it means "online" vs "IRL" in this instance the word "swag" and "sending it."
Digital natives think "swag" is a thing like "mojo" or "booboo magic" and not a thing you roll out on the ground to sleep.
As someone who has slept in Japanese style rooms mant a moons I'm going to start clowning, "send futon."
Now! How can I blame this on the meat puppets using MetaAI?
